[1]李爱丽 黄丽芳 刘昊虹.酶联免疫吸附法与甲苯胺红不加热血清试验法在梅毒检验中的应用效果[J].中国实用乡村医生杂志,2020,27(02):36-38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7185.2020.02.014 ]
 LI Aili,HUANG Lifang,LIU Haohong.Application of ELISA Test and Toluidine Red Unheated Serum Test in Syphilis Detection[J].Chinese Practical Journal of Rural Doctor,2020,27(02):36-38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7185.2020.02.014 ]
点击复制

酶联免疫吸附法与甲苯胺红不加热血清试验法在梅毒检验中的应用效果()
分享到:

《中国实用乡村医生杂志》[ISSN:1672-7185/CN:21-1502/R]

卷:
27
期数:
2020年02期
页码:
36-38
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2020-02-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of ELISA Test and Toluidine Red Unheated Serum Test in Syphilis Detection
文章编号:
 1672-7185(2020)02-0036-03 
作者:
李爱丽 黄丽芳 刘昊虹
作者单位:512000 广东 韶关,韶关市第一人民医院检验科
Author(s):
LI Aili HUANG Lifang LIU Haohong
(Department of Laboratory, First People’s Hospital of Shaoguan, Shaoguan 512000, Guangdong Province, China)
关键词:
 ELISA法TRUST法TPPA法梅毒阳性检出率诊断效能
Keywords:
 ELISA Method TRUST TPPA Method Syphilitic Disease Positive Detection Rate Diagnostic Efficacy
分类号:
 R446 
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-7185.2020.02.014
文献标志码:
 A
摘要:
 目的 探讨酶联免疫吸附(ELISA)法与甲苯胺红不加热血清试验(TRUST)法在梅毒检测中的应用价值。方法 选取2017年2月—2019年2月广东省韶关市第一人民医院收治的疑似梅毒患者320例为研究对象,所有患者均接受ELISA法与TRUST法检验,最终以梅毒螺旋体明胶颗粒凝集试验(TPPA)作为诊断的金标准,比较不同检验方法的阳性检出率及诊断效能。结果 E L I SA法在梅毒检验中的敏感性为96.19%,特异性为95.45%,准确性为95.94%,阳性预测值为97.58%;T R U S T法在梅毒检验中的敏感性为79.52%,特异性为83.64%,准确性为80.94%,阳性预测值为90.27%;两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 与TRUST法相比,ELISA法的阳性检出率及诊断效能更高,与TPPA检验结果相当,值得在梅毒检验中应用推广。
Abstract:
 Objective To explore the value of ELISAand TRUST in syphilis detection. Methods A total of 320 suspected syphilis patients were selected from February 2017 to February 2019 in our hospital. All patients were tested by ELISAand TRUST methods, and finally the treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) was used as the gold standard for diagnosis. The positive rates and diagnostic performances of different methods were compared. Results The sensitivity of ELISAin syphilis test was 96.19%, the specificity was 95.45%, the accuracy was 95.94%, the positive prediction value was 97.58%, the sensitivity of TRUST in syphilis test was 79.52%, the specificity was 83.64%, the accuracy was 80.94%, and the positive prediction value was 90.27%. There was a statistical difference between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with TRUST method, ELISA method has higher positive detection rate and diagnostic efficacy, and is comparable to TPPA results. It is worth applying in syphilis detection.

参考文献/References:

[1] 郭家权,洪敏,林永前.酶联免疫吸附法检测与甲苯胺红不加热血清试验在梅毒检验中应用价值的比较[J].广东医学,2014,35(5):738-740.
[2] 吴昊.酶联免疫吸附法与甲苯胺红不加热血清试验在梅毒检验中诊断价值的比较[ J].国际检验医学杂志,2017,38(23):3298-3299.
[3]钟鸣,姚倩瑜,刘惠,等.酶联免疫吸附法检测与甲苯胺红不加热血清试验在梅毒检验中应用价值比较[J].现代诊断与治疗,2017,28(4):686-687.
[4] 肖登峰.酶联免疫吸附法检测与甲苯胺红不加热血清试验在梅毒检验中应用价值的比较[J].生物医学工程学进展,2017,38(2):110-111.
[5] 梁服泉,朱秀兰,彭健华.酶联免疫吸附法检测与甲苯胺红不加热血清试验在梅毒检验中应用对比[J].中国实用医药,2016,11(13):20-21.
[6] 陈荣.酶联免疫吸附法检测与甲苯胺红不加热血清试验在梅毒检验中应用价值的比较[J].航空航天医学杂志,2017,28(7):836-838.
[7] 吴晓红.酶联免疫吸附法与甲苯胺红不加热血清试验在梅毒检验中应用价值的比较[ J].检验医学与临床,2016,13(Z1):212-213.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-08-28

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-03-10