[1]马传胜 周传江 崔金敏 段超.电视胸腔镜手术治疗非小细胞肺癌的效果分析[J].中国实用乡村医生杂志,2019,26(11):70-72.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7185.2019.11.028 ]
 MA Chuansheng,ZHOU Chuanjiang,CUI Jinmin,et al.Clinical Effects of Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer[J].Chinese Practical Journal of Rural Doctor,2019,26(11):70-72.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7185.2019.11.028 ]
点击复制

电视胸腔镜手术治疗非小细胞肺癌的效果分析()
分享到:

《中国实用乡村医生杂志》[ISSN:1672-7185/CN:21-1502/R]

卷:
26
期数:
2019年11期
页码:
70-72
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2019-11-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Effects of Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
文章编号:
 1672-7185(2019)11-0070-03 
作者:
马传胜 周传江 崔金敏 段超
作者单位:117000 辽宁 本溪,本溪市中心医院心胸外科
Author(s):
MA Chuansheng ZHOU Chuanjiang CUI Jinmin DUAN Chao
(Cardiothoracic Surgery, Benxi Central Hospital, Benxi 117000, Liaoning Province, China)
关键词:
 非小细胞肺癌手术治疗电视胸腔镜肺叶切除淋巴结清扫
Keywords:
 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Surgery Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Lymphadenectomy
分类号:
 R734 
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-7185.2019.11.028
文献标志码:
 A
摘要:
 目的 探讨电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)治疗非小细胞肺癌的效果。方法 选取2015年1月—2017年12月在 本溪市中心医院心胸外科,接受电视胸腔镜下肺叶切除及纵隔淋巴结清扫术治疗的60例非小细胞肺癌患者作为V A TS组,选择同期在我院接受常规开胸肺叶切除及纵隔淋巴结清扫术治疗的60例非小细胞肺癌患者作为传统手术组;比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、摘除淋巴结总数、留置引流管时间、平均引流量、围手术期死亡率、住院时间、术后并发症发生情况及术后1年生存率。结果 VATS组术中出血量、胸腔引流时间、平均引流量、住院时间及术后并发症发生率均优于传统手术组,差异均有统计学意义( P<0.05)。两组手术时间、摘除淋巴结总数、围手术期死亡率及术后1年生存率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 电视胸腔镜手术治疗非小细胞肺癌的近期疗效及淋巴结清扫效果与开放手术相当,而且电视胸腔镜手术的创伤小,患者术后恢复快、并发症少,可在 有条件的医疗机构推广开展。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the effect of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery(VATS) in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Methods From January 2015 to December 2017, 60 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in the cardiothoracic surgery of Benxi Central Hospital were selected as VATS group, and 60 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent conventional thoracotomy and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in the same period were selected as the traditional operation group. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, total lymph node removal, indwelling drainage tube time, average drainage volume, perioperative mortality, hospital stay, complications and 1-year survival rate were compared between the two groups. Results The intraoperative bleeding volume, thoracic drainage time, average drainage volume, hospitalization time and the incidence of postoperative complications in VATS group were significantly less than those in traditional operation group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in operative time, total lymph node removal, perioperative mortality and 1-year survival rate between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer has the same short- term efficacy and lymphatic clearance ability as open surgery, and it has the advantages of less trauma, faster recovery and fewer complications. It can be promoted in qualified medical institutions.

参考文献/References:

[1] SWANSON SJ, HERNDON JE, D’AMICO TA, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: report of CALGB 39802-a prospective, multi-institution feasibility study[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25(31): 4993-4997.
[2] 蒲振业,陈亮,朱全,等.完全胸腔镜与开放性肺叶切除术治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者围手术期I G F B P-3、VEGF、IL-6水平的比较[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2011,31(7):1027-1031.
[3] 任晓.胸腔镜下肺癌根治术与开胸肺叶切除术+纵隔淋巴结清扫治疗老年Ⅰ~Ⅱ期非小细胞肺癌对比观察[J].中国临床医生杂志,2019,47(6):677-679.
[4] 陈健,洪卫东,卢金山.全胸腔镜下肺叶切除术治疗肺癌对患者引流量、疼痛评分的影响[J].实用癌症杂志,2019,34(5):763-765.
[5]张晔,马冬捷,陈野野,等.电视胸腔镜与开放肺叶切除术治疗非小细胞肺癌的临床结局比较[J].现代生物医学进展,2016,16(21):4042-4046.
[6]蒋伟,奚俊杰,汪灏,等.全胸腔镜肺叶切除术治疗临床早期非小细胞肺癌的疗效评价[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2012,19(2):120-124.
[7] HIGUCHI M, YAGINUMA H, YONECHI A, et al. Long-term outcomes after video-assisted thoracic surgery(VATS) lobectomy versus lobectomy via open thoracotomy for clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2014, 9: 88.

相似文献/References:

[1]李玉田.单孔与多孔腹腔镜高位结扎术治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝的效果比较[J].中国实用乡村医生杂志,2019,26(03):55.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7185.2019.03.025 ]
 LI Yutian.Clinical Effectiveness Research of Single-incision Laparoscopic High Ligation Versus Conventional Laparoscopic High Ligation for Indirect Inguinal Hernia in Children[J].Chinese Practical Journal of Rural Doctor,2019,26(11):55.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7185.2019.03.025 ]
[2]刘殿勇.腹腔镜下输尿管膀胱再植术治疗小儿膀胱输尿管反流的效果研究[J].中国实用乡村医生杂志,2019,26(03):61.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7185.2019.03.027 ]
 LIU Dianyong.Clinical Effect of Laparoscopic Ureterovesical Replantation in the Treatment of Bladder-ureter Reflux in Children[J].Chinese Practical Journal of Rural Doctor,2019,26(11):61.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7185.2019.03.027 ]
[3]于溪 马怡 张志强 王晓舟 李洪石 赫丽杰.晚期非小细胞肺癌DC-CIK细胞免疫治疗联合化疗的临床疗效观察[J].中国实用乡村医生杂志,2019,26(02):66.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7185.2019.02.027 ]
 YU Xi,MA Yi,ZHANG Zhiqiang,et al.Clinical Efficacy of DC-CIK Cell Immunotherapy Combined with Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer[J].Chinese Practical Journal of Rural Doctor,2019,26(11):66.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7185.2019.02.027 ]
[4]史力军 马跃峰 杨玉龙 刘飞 祁春春 李婧伊 林美举 张洪威.腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术与开腹胆总管切开取石术治疗胆总管结石的效果比较[J].中国实用乡村医生杂志,2018,25(11):53.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7185.2018.11.021 ]
 SHI Lijun,MA Yuefeng,YANG Yulong,et al.Comparison of Laparoscopic Choledocholithotomy and Open Choledocholithotomy in Treatment of Choledocholithiasis[J].Chinese Practical Journal of Rural Doctor,2018,25(11):53.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7185.2018.11.021 ]
[5]房明.腹腔镜下阑尾切除术中阑尾系膜血管处理方法的研究进展[J].中国实用乡村医生杂志,2019,26(07):34.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7185.2019.07.014 ]
[6]李恒健.白内障手术患者术前应用静默疗法对其焦虑和手术配合度的影响[J].中国实用乡村医生杂志,2019,26(07):55.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7185.2019.07.021 ]
 LI Hengjian.Effect of Silent Therapy on Anxiety and Operation Coordination in Cataract Patients before Surgery[J].Chinese Practical Journal of Rural Doctor,2019,26(11):55.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7185.2019.07.021 ]
[7]何信.支撑喉镜与纤维喉镜治疗声带息肉的临床对照研究[J].中国实用乡村医生杂志,2019,26(07):71.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7185.2019.07.026 ]
 HE Xin.Comparative Study of Suspension Laryngoscopy and Fiberolaryngoscope in the Treatment of Vocal Cord Polyp[J].Chinese Practical Journal of Rural Doctor,2019,26(11):71.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7185.2019.07.026 ]
[8]矫正宇.经皮微创与切开钢板内固定术治疗四肢骨折的临床效果比较[J].中国实用乡村医生杂志,2019,26(09):59.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7185.2019.09.026 ]
 JIAO Zhengyu.Clinical Comparison of Percutaneous Minimally Invasive Plate Internal Fixation and Incision Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Limb Fractures[J].Chinese Practical Journal of Rural Doctor,2019,26(11):59.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7185.2019.09.026 ]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-06-05)

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-11-26